Zimbabwe’s Draft Tourism Bill Sparks Debate Over Fair Representation
The proposed Tourism Bill in Zimbabwe has ignited spirited discussion, with concerns mounting that the legislation could inadvertently marginalize small operators and local communities in favour of established industry giants. This debate, aired at a public hearing in Harare hosted by Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Environment, Climate, Wildlife and Tourism, highlights the crucial need for a more inclusive approach to sector reform.
Stakeholders from across the travel spectrum voiced apprehension that the current draft risks overlooking the very organizations and grassroots operators who, in practice, form the backbone of domestic tourism. “The bill overlooks key organisations and community operators who form the backbone of domestic tourism. We need a framework that reflects all industry players, not just a few,” one participant emphasized, capturing the sentiment shared by many present.
Many believe that if the bill passes in its present form, it could tilt the regulatory environment towards larger companies, diminishing opportunities for the small-scale entrepreneurs and community-based operators who bring unique local value to both domestic and inbound tourism. Broad-based participation, critics argue, is essential for ensuring that Zimbabwe’s tourism sector remains vibrant, competitive, and representative of the country’s rich cultural and natural diversity.
During the hearing, Joanah Mamombe, chairperson of the committee, reassured attendees that the bill remains a draft and is very much open to public scrutiny and amendment. “The Ministry of Tourism has tabled this bill as a proposal. Today, stakeholders and other parties have the parliamentary privilege to contribute. It only becomes an Act once passed by the National Assembly and Senate,” she clarified, urging all parties to continue engaging with the legislative process.
Government officials also moved to allay fears, promising that all feedback and objections would be carefully considered before the bill proceeds to its final stages. These assurances signal a willingness to listen, but for many in the sector, the challenge remains translating dialogue into policy that truly supports the diversity of industry players.
This legislative process comes at a pivotal moment for Zimbabwe’s tourism ambitions. The government has identified tourism as a key pillar in its strategy to achieve upper middle-income status, recognizing the sector’s potential as a major employer and engine for economic growth. However, realizing this potential depends on a policy framework that is inclusive, transparent, and supportive of innovation from the ground up.
For African travel agents and sector professionals, the outcome of this debate holds significant implications. A regulatory framework that favours only major players could stifle the entrepreneurial spirit and community engagement that increasingly define successful African tourism. Conversely, a bill shaped by broad stakeholder input could foster a more dynamic, resilient, and locally rooted tourism landscape.
The ongoing discussion around the Tourism Bill is also a reminder for travel professionals across the continent of the importance of active engagement in policy processes. The evolving sector demands that travel intermediaries, accommodation providers, tour operators, and community stakeholders all have a seat at the table—ensuring that modernization and growth do not come at the expense of diversity and local empowerment.
As the draft bill moves forward, the sector’s collective voice, particularly from small operators and community-based enterprises, will be instrumental in shaping a regulatory environment that benefits all. For now, the door remains open for input and advocacy—a critical juncture that could define the future of Zimbabwean and African tourism for years to come.
